Compare / Tana vs SiYuan

Comparison

Tana vs SiYuan

Tana is an AI-native outliner where “supertags” turn notes into structured, queryable objects; SiYuan is a free, open-source, block-based knowledge base with Notion-style databases and local storage. Here’s how they compare on pricing, platforms, linking, search, capture and collaboration — and how to decide between them.

What is Tana?

Tana’s big idea is the supertag: slap #meeting or #person on any outline node and it gains fields, views and behavior — your notes become a queryable database without leaving the outline. Live queries collect matching nodes anywhere in your workspace, which makes Tana feel like Roam and Notion fused together.

Since 2025 Tana has pivoted hard into being an “AI workspace”: a meeting agent that transcribes calls without a bot, voice capture that structures itself, semantic search, and full MCP support so AI assistants can work with your workspace on paid plans. Pricing reflects the AI ambition — a free tier with capped AI usage, Pro at $20/month (early-bird; $30 regular), and a $80+/month Max tier for heavy AI use. It’s cloud-based with web, desktop and capture-focused mobile apps.

What is SiYuan?

SiYuan packs a remarkable amount into an open-source (AGPL) package: block-level bidirectional links, WYSIWYG Markdown, Notion-like database and attribute views, spaced-repetition flashcards, a graph, PDF annotation and a plugin marketplace — all stored locally, with the option to self-host the whole thing in Docker. It’s free for personal and commercial use.

Sync is where money changes hands, modestly: a one-time PRO license (~$64) unlocks third-party S3/WebDAV sync, or you can subscribe to the official encrypted cloud service. The developer is China-based with a very active GitHub, and the app is fully usable in English. It’s single-player — no real-time collaboration — but as a personal all-in-one it rivals tools costing $100+/year.

Tana vs SiYuan at a glance

TanaSiYuan
PricePro $20/mo (early-bird; $30 regular); Max from $80/moFree; PRO one-time ~$64; optional paid official cloud sync
Free planYes — with capped AI usageYes — full core app, commercial use included
PlatformsWeb, macOS, Windows; iOS/Android capture appsWindows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, Docker (self-host)
Storage modelCloudLocal-first; encrypted sync via official cloud or your own S3/WebDAV
Editing modelOutliner with supertags (typed nodes, fields, live queries)Block-based WYSIWYG Markdown with database views
Backlinks & wiki linksYes — references and backlinksYes — block-level bidirectional links
Graph viewNo traditional graph viewYes — graph view
SearchFull-text, structured queries, semantic AI searchFull-text, including SQL-style queries
Web captureMobile capture apps, voice captureBrowser clipping extension
Email-in captureNoNo
RSS / feedsNoNo
Team collaborationYes — real-time shared workspacesNo
Publishing & sharingShared/published nodesExport or self-hosted sharing
AI assistant accessDeep native AI + full MCP support (paid plans)Configurable OpenAI-compatible integration
Offline accessLimitedYes — fully offline
Open sourceNoYes — AGPL-3.0
End-to-end encryptionNoYes — encrypted sync
Data exportJSON export (limited)Markdown, PDF, and more

Pricing and features as of mid-2026 — check each product’s site for current details.

Where Tana shines

Worth knowing: It’s the most expensive tool in this comparison once you use it seriously — AI usage is metered, and Pro runs $20–30/month. Cloud-only and proprietary: no local files, no end-to-end encryption, and export is limited. The structure-first approach has a real learning curve; casual note-takers may find it over-engineered.

Where SiYuan shines

Worth knowing: No collaboration and no first-party hosted sharing beyond exports and self-hosting. The interface is denser and less polished than Western commercial rivals, and documentation can be rough in translation. Capture from the web, email or feeds isn’t a focus.

Which should you choose?

Choose Tana if:

Choose SiYuan if:

A third option: Dexi

If what you actually want is one searchable place for notes, bookmarks, newsletters and RSS — with tags, @mentions and [[wiki links]] that organize themselves as you write, semantic search that finds ideas even when the words don’t match, and an MCP server so Claude and other AI assistants can work with your notes directly — take a look at Dexi. It’s free for up to 1,000 notes, with no app to install.

Frequently asked questions

What is the main difference between Tana and SiYuan?

Tana is an AI-native outliner where “supertags” turn notes into structured, queryable objects, while SiYuan is a free, open-source, block-based knowledge base with Notion-style databases and local storage. In practice, Tana is best for structured-thinking power users who want their notes to behave like a database, with AI doing the heavy lifting; SiYuan is best for self-hosters and open-source enthusiasts who want Notion-grade blocks and databases on their own disk.

Which is cheaper, Tana or SiYuan?

Tana: Pro $20/mo (early-bird; $30 regular); Max from $80/mo (free plan: yes — with capped ai usage). SiYuan: Free; PRO one-time ~$64; optional paid official cloud sync (free plan: yes — full core app, commercial use included). Prices as of mid-2026 — check each product's site for current rates.

Is Tana or SiYuan better for teams?

Tana — team collaboration: yes — real-time shared workspaces. SiYuan — team collaboration: no. If neither fits, Dexi's Team plan ($10/member/month) offers per-note sharing with team-wide search.

Can I switch between Tana and SiYuan?

Both tools let you get your data out — Tana exports via json export (limited), and SiYuan via markdown, pdf, and more. Markdown is the common ground for most migrations, though block references, properties and other tool-specific structure typically need manual cleanup after import.

Collect, connect and search everything you read — free, no credit card required.

Try Dexi free

Related comparisons