Compare / Tana vs Capacities

Comparison

Tana vs Capacities: supertags or objects in 2026?

Capacities vs Tana is the structured-notes matchup: both reject folders for typed things — a #meeting supertag in Tana, a Meeting object in Capacities — and both are cloud apps with free tiers and a paid plan for the serious user. The differences are in what each charges for and who it’s for: Tana is an AI-first outliner metered by credits — and, since March 2026, one of two products sharing the name; Capacities is a polished, deliberately single-player studio. Every number below is dated, because both price lists moved this year.

The short answer: Capacities for structured personal notes — objects, daily notes and free sync in a beautiful app, with Pro at $9.99/month. Tana if you’ll genuinely use what its subscription buys: the botless meeting agent, voice capture, live queries and real-time shared workspaces — at $8–14/month for Tana Outliner. The common mistake is paying for Tana as a personal notes app, or expecting Capacities to ever do teams.

TanaCapacities
Data modelOutliner; supertags turn nodes into typed objects with fieldsTyped objects with properties, daily notes, calendar
PriceTana Outliner: Plus $8/mo, Pro $14/mo (22% off yearly)Pro $9.99/mo (annual; $11.99 monthly); Believer from $12.49
Free planYes — 500 AI credits/mo, 3 workspaces, 0.5 GBYes — unlimited notes, sync; 5 GB media
AIMeeting agent, voice agent, AI chat — credit-meteredAssistant on Pro; Pro+ add-on buys more AI budget
CollaborationReal-time shared workspacesNone — stated as not planned
OfflinePersonal workspaces since late 2025Cached per device, merges on reconnect
AgentsLocal MCP server in the desktop appHosted MCP server + REST API with OAuth
ExportMarkdown or JSON; supertags flattenMarkdown; object types flatten

As of September 2026 — Tana Outliner plans per outliner.tana.inc (re-read Sep 19, 2026), Tana release notes Aug 28, 2026 (voice agent, natural-language search, daily briefs); Capacities Release 69, Aug 2026.

What is Tana?

Tana’s big idea is the supertag: slap #meeting or #person on any outline node and it gains fields, views and behavior — your notes become a queryable database without leaving the outline. Live queries collect matching nodes anywhere in your workspace, which makes Tana feel like Roam and Notion fused together.

Since 2025 Tana has pivoted hard into AI: a meeting agent that transcribes calls without a bot, voice capture that structures itself, semantic search, and a local MCP server so AI assistants can work with your workspace. In March 2026 the company split in two — the notes tool became Tana Outliner (outliner.tana.inc, the product compared here), while the plain “Tana” name moved to a separate agentic meeting platform. Outliner pricing as of September 2026: Free with 500 AI credits a month, Plus at $8/month and Pro at $14/month (22% off billed yearly; students, academics and NGOs get 50% off). It’s cloud-based with web, desktop and capture-focused mobile apps.

What is Capacities?

Capacities organizes your knowledge by what things are. Instead of files in folders, you create objects — people, books, meetings, projects, quotes — each with its own properties and views, connected through backlinks and daily notes. Browsing by object type (every book you’ve noted, every person you’ve met) falls out of the design for free, and a calendar-centric daily view ties it to your day.

It’s a polished, cloud-based app on web, desktop and mobile, with a generous free core plan; Pro (about $10/month billed annually) adds the AI assistant, calendar sync and advanced queries. In July 2026 it shipped a developer API with OAuth, opening it up to integrations. One deliberate omission to know about: there is no collaboration, and the team has said it isn’t planned — Capacities is intentionally a personal tool.

Tana vs Capacities at a glance

TanaCapacities
PricePlus $8/mo; Pro $14/mo (22% off yearly) — Tana Outliner, Sep 2026Pro ~$9.99/mo annual ($11.99 monthly); Believer ~$12.49/mo
Free planYes — 500 AI credits/mo, 3 workspaces, 0.5 GBYes — generous core plan
PlatformsWeb, macOS, Windows; iOS/Android capture appsWeb, macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android
Storage modelCloudCloud (offline support, not local-first)
Editing modelOutliner with supertags (typed nodes, fields, live queries)Object-based pages with properties, blocks and daily notes
Backlinks & wiki linksYes — references and backlinksYes — backlinks between objects
Graph viewNo traditional graph viewYes — per-object connection views
SearchFull-text, structured queries, semantic AI searchFull-text; AI search on Pro
Web captureMobile capture apps, voice captureWeblink reader and mobile share
Email-in captureNoNo
RSS / feedsNoNo
Team collaborationYes — real-time shared workspacesNo — explicitly not planned
Publishing & sharingShared/published nodesRead-only share links for pages
AI assistant accessDeep native AI (credit-metered) + local MCP server in the desktop appBuilt-in AI assistant (Pro); developer API (OAuth) since 2026
Offline accessPartial — desktop app, personal workspacesPartial
Open sourceNoNo
End-to-end encryptionNoNo
Data exportMarkdown or JSON workspace export (supertags flatten)Markdown export

Pricing and features as of mid-2026 — check each product’s site for current details.

New to personal knowledge management? Start here: choosing a second brain app — every tool on this page, with a pick for each kind of thinker.

Supertags vs object types — same idea, different ceremony

Tana’s structure lives inside the outline: add #meeting to any bullet and it inherits fields, views and behaviour; a live query anywhere in the workspace then collects every meeting with a given attendee or date. Structure emerges from typing and is queryable to a degree nothing else in the category matches — which is also why Tana has a real learning curve and why its documentation reads like a database manual.

Capacities starts from the object rather than the outline: you create a Meeting, it has the properties its type defines, and browsing every meeting (or every book, or every person) falls out of the design without writing a query. Daily notes and a calendar anchor the experience. It is less powerful than supertags and much easier to live in; “project management in Capacities” is a real workflow on Pro (tasks, calendar sync, queries), but it is a well-organised notebook, not a Tana-style database. If the other object-first app is on your list too, we’ve compared Capacities against Anytype and both against Obsidian — Obsidian vs Tana, Obsidian vs Capacities.

Tana pricing vs Capacities pricing — what you actually pay

This is where the two diverge most, and the numbers are dated because Tana’s are labelled provisional. As of September 2026:

Read that as: Capacities Pro at $9.99 sits between Tana Outliner’s Plus and Pro, and both free plans are usable — the difference is what the money buys. Capacities bundles its assistant; Tana meters everything by credits, and only wins the price comparison if the meeting agent replaces a transcription tool you already pay for — then the math changes.

AI — metered credits vs a bundled assistant, and MCP on both

Tana is AI-native by design: a meeting agent that transcribes Zoom, Teams and Meet calls without a bot, and since August 2026 a background voice agent that captures and files while you talk, natural-language search across the workspace, and daily briefs delivered to Slack. All of it draws on the credits that define its plans, which is the point: Tana is selling an AI workspace with notes in it.

Capacities bundles a more modest AI assistant on Pro and, since August 2026, lets you top up its budget rather than plug in your own key. Its real opening is to outside agents: a full REST API with OAuth (API 2.0) and an official hosted MCP server that connects Claude or any MCP client to a chosen space. Tana has an official MCP server too, running locally inside the desktop app. If the AI you want is Tana’s own, Tana; if it’s an assistant you already use, both work and Capacities is cheaper.

Collaboration and project management — real-time vs never

Tana is a multiplayer tool: shared workspaces with live co-editing, roles, and a Business tier built for teams. If your notes are shared with colleagues, this section ends the comparison. Capacities has put in writing that team features are not planned — it is a personal tool, and the sharing ceiling is read-only page links. That focus is part of why the solo experience is so coherent, and no amount of waiting changes it.

For a solo user managing projects, Capacities Pro does the job — tasks, a calendar view, queries over your project objects — but without Tana’s live queries and supertag inheritance. Capacities publishes an official “Switching from Tana to Capacities” guide, which tells you who is moving in which direction in 2026.

Offline, export and switching

Both are cloud services. Tana added an offline mode in late 2025 (full editing in personal workspaces, read access to shared ones); Capacities caches your notes on each device and merges edits on reconnect. Neither is end-to-end encrypted and neither can be self-hosted — if that matters, the object-based app with both is Anytype.

Leaving: Tana exports a whole workspace to Markdown or JSON; supertags and their fields flatten to text and node references lose their targets. Capacities exports Markdown; object types and properties flatten the same way. Tana → Capacities has that official guide (import the Markdown, re-type the objects); Capacities → Tana is a Markdown import with the same manual re-tagging. Trial-import a copy either way.

Where Tana shines

Worth knowing: AI usage is credit-metered on every plan and the free tier is thin (500 AI credits, 3 workspaces, 0.5 GB); serious use means Plus at $8/month or Pro at $14/month. Cloud-only and proprietary: no local files, no end-to-end encryption; export is Markdown or JSON, and supertags and fields flatten on the way out. The structure-first approach has a real learning curve; casual note-takers may find it over-engineered.

Where Capacities shines

Worth knowing: No collaboration — explicitly not supported and not planned; sharing is read-only page links. Cloud-first and proprietary, with no local-first storage or end-to-end encryption. Power features like queries sit behind Pro, and the object model can feel like ceremony for quick, messy capture.

Which should you choose?

Choose Tana if:

Choose Capacities if:

A third option: Dexi

Both apps make you decide what a thing is before you write about it, and neither collects anything from the web for you. If a lot of what you want to keep arrives as articles, newsletters and feeds, Dexi starts there: everything you capture from your browser, inbox or RSS becomes a note beside the ones you type, #tags, @mentions and [[wiki links]] typed inline do the structuring, inline key:: value properties feed table and card views when you want them, and an MCP server lets Claude work with your notes directly — no credits. Free for up to 1,000 notes, $5/month after, below either app’s paid plan.

Frequently asked questions

Is Tana or Capacities cheaper?

Close, since Tana split its products. Capacities’ free plan covers unlimited notes and sync (5 GB of media) and Pro is $9.99/month billed annually ($11.99 monthly). Tana Outliner’s free tier is 500 AI credits a month, 3 workspaces and 0.5 GB; Plus is $8/month and Pro $14/month, 22% less billed yearly, with AI metered by credits on every plan. The $20–30 “Pro” quoted elsewhere is the separate Tana meeting platform. Prices as of September 2026.

Can I switch from Tana to Capacities?

Yes — Capacities publishes an official "Switching from Tana to Capacities" guide. Export your Tana workspace to Markdown, import the folder into Capacities, and assign object types to what arrives: supertags and their fields flatten to text on the way out of Tana, so the structure is rebuilt by hand. Run a trial import on a copy first.

Does Capacities do project management?

At a personal scale, yes: Pro adds tasks, calendar integration and queries over your project objects, and many people run their projects in it. It has no live queries, supertag inheritance or team workspaces — if projects mean colleagues, Tana is the one built for that.

Is Tana worth it over Capacities?

Only if you will use what the money buys: the botless meeting agent, the voice agent, live queries over supertagged nodes, and real-time shared workspaces. If you mainly write and organise personal notes, Capacities does that more pleasantly for a similar price, with a bundled assistant instead of a credit meter and a more generous free plan.

Do Tana and Capacities work offline?

Partially, both. Tana has had an offline mode since late 2025 — full editing in personal workspaces, read-only for shared ones. Capacities downloads your notes to each device, stores edits locally when offline and syncs on reconnect. Neither is local-first in the files-on-disk sense, and neither is end-to-end encrypted.

Which is better for personal knowledge management, Tana or Capacities?

Capacities for most individuals: typed objects, daily notes, free sync and a bundled assistant, with no team ambitions to dilute it. Tana for people whose personal knowledge management is really a queryable database with AI on top — and who will pay for it.

Collect, connect and search everything you read — free, no credit card required.

Try Dexi free

Related comparisons

More Tana comparisons

More Capacities comparisons

All comparisons →

Looking for Notion alternatives? Our guide, by use case →