Tana vs Heptabase
Tana is an AI-native outliner where “supertags” turn notes into structured, queryable objects; Heptabase is a visual learning tool where notes are cards you arrange and connect on infinite whiteboards. Here’s how they compare on pricing, platforms, linking, search, capture and collaboration — and how to decide between them.
What is Tana?
Tana’s big idea is the supertag: slap #meeting or #person on any outline node and it gains fields, views and behavior — your notes become a queryable database without leaving the outline. Live queries collect matching nodes anywhere in your workspace, which makes Tana feel like Roam and Notion fused together.
Since 2025 Tana has pivoted hard into being an “AI workspace”: a meeting agent that transcribes calls without a bot, voice capture that structures itself, semantic search, and full MCP support so AI assistants can work with your workspace on paid plans. Pricing reflects the AI ambition — a free tier with capped AI usage, Pro at $20/month (early-bird; $30 regular), and a $80+/month Max tier for heavy AI use. It’s cloud-based with web, desktop and capture-focused mobile apps.
What is Heptabase?
Heptabase is for people who think spatially. Notes are cards; understanding happens by laying them out on infinite whiteboards, drawing connections, grouping into sections and mindmaps, and annotating PDFs alongside. It’s a deliberate take on learning deeply — less “capture everything” and more “make sense of what you’re studying” — and nothing else in this list matches its canvas experience.
Cards support Markdown, backlinks, tags with table views, and journals, so it still functions as a complete note system off the whiteboard. It runs on desktop, web and mobile with offline support and cloud sync. There’s no free plan (7-day trial); 2026 pricing is AI-credit-tiered — Pro at $8.99/month (annual) with Premium tiers above it for heavier AI use.
Tana vs Heptabase at a glance
| Tana | Heptabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Pro $20/mo (early-bird; $30 regular); Max from $80/mo | Pro $8.99/mo (annual); Premium tiers for more AI credits |
| Free plan | Yes — with capped AI usage | No — 7-day trial |
| Platforms | Web, macOS, Windows; iOS/Android capture apps | Web, macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android |
| Storage model | Cloud | Cloud-synced with strong offline support |
| Editing model | Outliner with supertags (typed nodes, fields, live queries) | Cards on infinite whiteboards; Markdown, mindmaps, sections |
| Backlinks & wiki links | Yes — references and backlinks | Yes — card links and backlinks |
| Graph view | No traditional graph view | Whiteboards serve as the visual map |
| Search | Full-text, structured queries, semantic AI search | Full-text |
| Web capture | Mobile capture apps, voice capture | Limited — no first-party clipper |
| Email-in capture | No | No |
| RSS / feeds | No | No |
| Team collaboration | Yes — real-time shared workspaces | Limited — shared whiteboards |
| Publishing & sharing | Shared/published nodes | Read-only whiteboard sharing |
| AI assistant access | Deep native AI + full MCP support (paid plans) | Built-in AI (credit-metered); no MCP |
| Offline access | Limited | Yes |
| Open source | No | No |
| End-to-end encryption | No | No |
| Data export | JSON export (limited) | Markdown, PDF |
Pricing and features as of mid-2026 — check each product’s site for current details.
Where Tana shines
- Supertags are the most elegant structure system in the category — schema, views and queries grow naturally out of plain outlining.
- The AI feature set is the deepest here: botless meeting transcription, voice capture, agents, and semantic search.
- Full MCP support (on paid plans) makes it one of the few tools built for AI-assistant workflows.
- Real-time multiplayer workspaces work well for teams.
Worth knowing: It’s the most expensive tool in this comparison once you use it seriously — AI usage is metered, and Pro runs $20–30/month. Cloud-only and proprietary: no local files, no end-to-end encryption, and export is limited. The structure-first approach has a real learning curve; casual note-takers may find it over-engineered.
Where Heptabase shines
- The best whiteboard-native note experience available — cards, sections, mindmaps and connections feel built-in, not bolted on.
- PDF annotation on the same canvas as your notes suits deep study workflows.
- Tags double as tables, giving light database views over cards.
- Solid offline support with sync across desktop, web and mobile.
Worth knowing: No free plan — only a 7-day trial. Collaboration is limited to shared whiteboards; it’s primarily single-player. Spatial organization is the point — if you don’t think in maps, the canvas is overhead rather than insight.
Which should you choose?
Choose Tana if:
- You want notes with fields, views and queries — a database that emerges from writing.
- Meeting transcription and voice capture are core to your workflow.
- You’ll actually use enough AI to justify the price.
Choose Heptabase if:
- You learn by arranging ideas spatially and drawing the connections yourself.
- You study from PDFs and want annotation living next to your notes.
- A visual overview of a topic matters more to you than fast capture.
A third option: Dexi
If what you actually want is one searchable place for notes, bookmarks, newsletters and RSS — with tags, @mentions and [[wiki links]] that organize themselves as you write, semantic search that finds ideas even when the words don’t match, and an MCP server so Claude and other AI assistants can work with your notes directly — take a look at Dexi. It’s free for up to 1,000 notes, with no app to install.
Frequently asked questions
What is the main difference between Tana and Heptabase?
Tana is an AI-native outliner where “supertags” turn notes into structured, queryable objects, while Heptabase is a visual learning tool where notes are cards you arrange and connect on infinite whiteboards. In practice, Tana is best for structured-thinking power users who want their notes to behave like a database, with AI doing the heavy lifting; Heptabase is best for students, researchers and visual thinkers who understand topics by mapping them out spatially.
Which is cheaper, Tana or Heptabase?
Tana: Pro $20/mo (early-bird; $30 regular); Max from $80/mo (free plan: yes — with capped ai usage). Heptabase: Pro $8.99/mo (annual); Premium tiers for more AI credits (free plan: no — 7-day trial). Prices as of mid-2026 — check each product's site for current rates.
Is Tana or Heptabase better for teams?
Tana — team collaboration: yes — real-time shared workspaces. Heptabase — team collaboration: limited — shared whiteboards. If neither fits, Dexi's Team plan ($10/member/month) offers per-note sharing with team-wide search.
Can I switch between Tana and Heptabase?
Both tools let you get your data out — Tana exports via json export (limited), and Heptabase via markdown, pdf. Markdown is the common ground for most migrations, though block references, properties and other tool-specific structure typically need manual cleanup after import.
Collect, connect and search everything you read — free, no credit card required.
Try Dexi free