Compare / Logseq vs Tana

Comparison

Logseq vs Tana

Logseq is a free, open-source, local-first outliner with flashcards and a privacy-first ethos; Tana is an AI-native outliner where “supertags” turn notes into structured, queryable objects. Here’s how they compare on pricing, platforms, linking, search, capture and collaboration — and how to decide between them.

What is Logseq?

Logseq is the open-source counterpart to Roam: an outliner built on bidirectional links and daily notes, but storing everything as local Markdown (or Org-mode) files on your device. It’s free, AGPL-licensed, and adds flashcards with spaced repetition, PDF annotation, queries, whiteboards and a plugin ecosystem. Sync is available end-to-end encrypted, or you can roll your own with Git or Syncthing.

The project is mid-transition: alongside the classic Markdown version, a rebuilt “DB version” backed by a local database entered public beta in July 2026, bringing real properties and Tana-style structured tags plus more reliable sync. That rewrite consumed several years of development attention, so the classic version evolved slowly — but the foundation of free, local, open-source outlining has kept a devoted community.

What is Tana?

Tana’s big idea is the supertag: slap #meeting or #person on any outline node and it gains fields, views and behavior — your notes become a queryable database without leaving the outline. Live queries collect matching nodes anywhere in your workspace, which makes Tana feel like Roam and Notion fused together.

Since 2025 Tana has pivoted hard into being an “AI workspace”: a meeting agent that transcribes calls without a bot, voice capture that structures itself, semantic search, and full MCP support so AI assistants can work with your workspace on paid plans. Pricing reflects the AI ambition — a free tier with capped AI usage, Pro at $20/month (early-bird; $30 regular), and a $80+/month Max tier for heavy AI use. It’s cloud-based with web, desktop and capture-focused mobile apps.

Logseq vs Tana at a glance

LogseqTana
PriceFree (open source); optional paid syncPro $20/mo (early-bird; $30 regular); Max from $80/mo
Free planYes — everythingYes — with capped AI usage
PlatformsWindows, macOS, Linux, iOS, AndroidWeb, macOS, Windows; iOS/Android capture apps
Storage modelLocal-first — Markdown/Org files (DB version: local database)Cloud
Editing modelOutliner — blocks, references, daily notesOutliner with supertags (typed nodes, fields, live queries)
Backlinks & wiki linksYes — bidirectional, block-levelYes — references and backlinks
Graph viewYes — graph viewNo traditional graph view
SearchFull-text and queriesFull-text, structured queries, semantic AI search
Web captureCommunity clippers; mobile quick captureMobile capture apps, voice capture
Email-in captureNoNo
RSS / feedsNoNo
Team collaborationNoYes — real-time shared workspaces
Publishing & sharingStatic-site export via community toolsShared/published nodes
AI assistant accessCommunity plugins and MCP serversDeep native AI + full MCP support (paid plans)
Offline accessYes — fully offlineLimited
Open sourceYes — AGPL-3.0No
End-to-end encryptionYes — Logseq Sync is end-to-end encryptedNo
Data exportMarkdown/Org files; OPML, JSONJSON export (limited)

Pricing and features as of mid-2026 — check each product’s site for current details.

Where Logseq shines

Worth knowing: No real-time collaboration — it’s a single-player tool. The MD-to-DB transition splits the product; some features (like whiteboards) are temporarily missing from the DB beta. Polish and mobile experience trail the paid competition, and web capture relies on community tooling.

Where Tana shines

Worth knowing: It’s the most expensive tool in this comparison once you use it seriously — AI usage is metered, and Pro runs $20–30/month. Cloud-only and proprietary: no local files, no end-to-end encryption, and export is limited. The structure-first approach has a real learning curve; casual note-takers may find it over-engineered.

Which should you choose?

Choose Logseq if:

Choose Tana if:

A third option: Dexi

If what you actually want is one searchable place for notes, bookmarks, newsletters and RSS — with tags, @mentions and [[wiki links]] that organize themselves as you write, semantic search that finds ideas even when the words don’t match, and an MCP server so Claude and other AI assistants can work with your notes directly — take a look at Dexi. It’s free for up to 1,000 notes, with no app to install.

Frequently asked questions

What is the main difference between Logseq and Tana?

Logseq is a free, open-source, local-first outliner with flashcards and a privacy-first ethos, while Tana is an AI-native outliner where “supertags” turn notes into structured, queryable objects. In practice, Logseq is best for privacy-conscious outliner fans who want Roam’s ideas as free, open-source local files; Tana is best for structured-thinking power users who want their notes to behave like a database, with AI doing the heavy lifting.

Which is cheaper, Logseq or Tana?

Logseq: Free (open source); optional paid sync (free plan: yes — everything). Tana: Pro $20/mo (early-bird; $30 regular); Max from $80/mo (free plan: yes — with capped ai usage). Prices as of mid-2026 — check each product's site for current rates.

Is Logseq or Tana better for teams?

Logseq — team collaboration: no. Tana — team collaboration: yes — real-time shared workspaces. If neither fits, Dexi's Team plan ($10/member/month) offers per-note sharing with team-wide search.

Can I switch between Logseq and Tana?

Both tools let you get your data out — Logseq exports via markdown/org files; opml, json, and Tana via json export (limited). Markdown is the common ground for most migrations, though block references, properties and other tool-specific structure typically need manual cleanup after import.

Collect, connect and search everything you read — free, no credit card required.

Try Dexi free

Related comparisons