Compare / Anytype vs SiYuan

Comparison

SiYuan vs Anytype: which local-first notes app in 2026?

Anytype vs SiYuan is the privacy-purist matchup: both keep your notes on your own device, both encrypt what leaves it, both can be self-hosted, and both were built in explicit opposition to the “your notes in someone’s cloud” model. So the usual local-vs-cloud argument decides nothing here. What does: how each app wants you to structure knowledge (block documents vs typed objects), what sync costs and who runs it, the licensing asymmetry — SiYuan is AGPL open source, Anytype is source-available under its own license — and how cleanly you can leave. Every price and project-health claim below is dated, because this audience checks.

The short answer: Anytype is the easier daily driver — Notion-style objects and relations, end-to-end encryption, and free multi-device sync that works the moment you install the phone app. SiYuan is the more open and more complete one: AGPL-licensed, self-hostable as a whole app in Docker, with documents, database views, flashcards and PDF annotation built in — and sync that costs a one-time $64 to your own storage. Pick on license and data model; both are safe long-term homes for your notes.

AnytypeSiYuan
Data modelObjects with types, relations, setsBlock documents with database views
LicenseSource-available (Any Source Available License 1.0)Open source, AGPL-3.0
PriceFree; storage tiers $4 / $8 / $16 per mo (annual)Free; PRO $64 one-time; cloud $148/yr
SyncBuilt in, E2E encrypted, peer-to-peer, freeYour own S3/WebDAV (PRO) or official cloud
Self-hostingSync network (any-sync) in DockerWhole app in Docker, used from a browser
CollaborationMultiplayer shared SpacesNone
MobileiOS, Android — polished; no web appiOS, Android — functional; browser via self-host
ExportMarkdown, JSON/protobuf; relations flattenMarkdown, PDF; refs and database views flatten

As of August 2026 — Anytype desktop 0.56.1 (Jul 28, 2026), SiYuan 3.8.0 (Aug 12, 2026).

What is Anytype?

Anytype wants to be the privacy-maximalist answer to Notion: objects with types, relations and sets, composed from blocks — but stored on your device, end-to-end encrypted, and synced peer-to-peer through a network you can self-host. The source is available (under its own license), and the free plan includes the full feature set with local storage limited only by your disk.

Collaboration arrived in 2024–25 via multiplayer shared Spaces, and publishing to the web followed, so it’s no longer strictly single-player. Paid tiers (Plus $4, Pro $8, Ultra $16 per month) mostly buy network storage rather than features. An official API and MCP server (2025) let AI assistants work with your data — notably, without Anytype itself pushing your notes through cloud AI, in keeping with its privacy stance.

What is SiYuan?

SiYuan packs a remarkable amount into an open-source (AGPL) package: block-level bidirectional links, WYSIWYG Markdown, Notion-like database and attribute views, spaced-repetition flashcards, a graph, PDF annotation and a plugin marketplace — all stored locally, with the option to self-host the whole thing in Docker. It’s free for personal and commercial use.

Sync is where money changes hands, modestly: a one-time PRO license (~$64) unlocks third-party S3/WebDAV sync, or you can subscribe to the official encrypted cloud service. The developer is China-based with a very active GitHub, and the app is fully usable in English. It’s single-player — no real-time collaboration — but as a personal all-in-one it rivals tools costing $100+/year.

Anytype vs SiYuan at a glance

AnytypeSiYuan
PricePlus $4/mo; Pro $8/mo; Ultra $16/mo (mostly network storage)Free; PRO one-time $64 (S3/WebDAV sync); official cloud $148/yr
Free planYes — full features, local storage unlimitedYes — full core app, commercial use included
PlatformsWindows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android — no web appWindows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, Docker (self-host)
Storage modelLocal-first, peer-to-peer encrypted sync, self-hostableLocal-first; encrypted sync via official cloud or your own S3/WebDAV
Editing modelObject-based — types, relations, sets, blocksBlock-based WYSIWYG Markdown with database views
Backlinks & wiki linksYes — relations and backlinksYes — block-level bidirectional links
Graph viewYes — graph viewYes — graph view
SearchLocal full-textFull-text, including SQL-style queries
Web captureBasic clipper; mobile shareBrowser clipping extension
Email-in captureNoNo
RSS / feedsNoNo
Team collaborationYes — multiplayer shared SpacesNo
Publishing & sharingPublish objects to the webExport or self-hosted sharing
AI assistant accessOfficial API + MCP server; no built-in cloud AIConfigurable OpenAI-compatible integration
Offline accessYes — fully offlineYes — fully offline
Open sourceSource-available (own license)Yes — AGPL-3.0
End-to-end encryptionYes — end-to-end, everythingYes — encrypted sync
Data exportMarkdown, JSON (protobuf)Markdown, PDF, and more

Pricing and features as of mid-2026 — check each product’s site for current details.

New to this category? Start here: choosing a second brain app — every tool on this page, with a pick for each kind of thinker.

Block documents vs objects, types and relations

SiYuan’s unit is the document: pages with headings and paragraphs in a WYSIWYG Markdown editor, where every paragraph is an addressable block you can reference or embed anywhere. Structure comes from Notion-style database and attribute views layered on top — a meeting note is a page with headings, and, if you want, also a row in a meetings database with date and attendee columns. It feels like writing; the database is optional.

Anytype’s unit is the object. That same meeting is a Meeting-type object with relations — Date, Attendees (linking to Person objects), Project — and its body is blocks inside that object; a Set or Collection then shows every Meeting as a table or gallery. Anytype makes you decide what a thing is before you write about it, which is exactly what structured thinkers want and exactly what people who just want to type find heavy. Neither model is more powerful; SiYuan starts from prose and lets you add structure, Anytype starts from structure and lets you add prose. (If your real comparison is with an outliner or plain Markdown files, we’ve compared SiYuan against Logseq and Obsidian, and Anytype against Logseq and Capacities.)

SiYuan pricing vs Anytype pricing — sync, storage and what you actually pay

Both apps are free to install and free to use offline forever. Money enters only when your notes need to reach a second device or a backup — and the two charge for that in opposite ways: SiYuan sells sync as a one-time unlock (or an annual cloud), Anytype includes sync free and sells remote storage. As of August 2026:

SiYuanAnytype
Free tierFull app, local storage, commercial use allowed — no syncFull app, E2E-encrypted sync between your devices, 100 MB remote storage, 10 shared channels
One-time purchasePRO $64 (list $96): encrypted sync/backup to your own S3 or WebDAV storageNone
SubscriptionOfficial cloud $148/yr (list $296): 8 GB, includes PRO, cloud asset hosting and a cloud inbox; annual only, seats limitedPlus 1 GB $4/mo · Pro 10 GB $8/mo · Ultra 100 GB $16/mo, billed yearly ($5 / $10 / $20 monthly); paid tiers also unlock unlimited shared channels and a custom ANY ID
Self-hostingThe whole app in Docker (free) — served from your machine, edited in a browserThe sync network (any-sync) in Docker (free); the apps stay local
Cheapest two-device setup$64 once + a few cents/month of S3, or self-host$0

Read that as: the cheapest way to sync a laptop and a phone is Anytype, free, with encryption you never configure. The cheapest way to sync without trusting anyone else’s server is SiYuan’s $64 against your own bucket — Anytype can match it by self-hosting any-sync, but that’s a weekend, not a checkbox. SiYuan’s official cloud is the odd one out at $148 a year for 8 GB, and it’s the only tier here with no refunds; most SiYuan users take the one-time license instead.

Licensing and project health — the asymmetry, dated

This is where the two diverge most sharply, and it’s worth being precise. As of August 2026:

Read that as: SiYuan’s freedom is legal and unconditional; Anytype’s is practical — you can read, run and self-host everything, you just can’t build a competing commercial service on it. If “open source” on your requirements list means the license, SiYuan is the only one that qualifies. If it means “I can see the code and leave with my data,” both do.

Mobile and offline

Both are fully offline-first — no account, no server, no connection required to write. On the phone, Anytype is the more finished experience: native iOS and Android apps with the same object model as desktop, and encrypted sync that’s already running by the time you sign in with your recovery phrase. There’s no web app, so “from any browser” is not an option, only publishing.

SiYuan has iOS and Android apps too, but they trail the desktop client in polish and get less of the attention — and syncing to them needs PRO or the cloud subscription. Its counter-move is the Docker self-host: the full app served from your own machine and edited from any browser, phone included, which for some people beats a native app. If mobile capture is a daily habit, Anytype; if you mostly write at a desk and want a browser fallback, SiYuan.

Getting your notes out — export and lock-in

What’s on disk? SiYuan stores each document as a JSON block tree in its own local format (with a SQLite index) and exports documents or whole notebooks to Markdown and PDF; block references and database views flatten on the way out. Anytype keeps an encrypted local database and exports to Markdown, plus JSON/protobuf for the full object graph; Markdown keeps your text and links but flattens types and relations. Both are open-format enough that leaving is an afternoon, not a crisis — but neither is “just files.”

Migrating between them: there is no direct importer in either direction, so Markdown is the bridge. SiYuan → Anytype: export the notebook as Markdown and import the folder — files become objects, [[wikilinks]] become linked objects, #tags become tag relations, database rows do not travel. Anytype → SiYuan: export Markdown and import the folder; text, images and links come through, relations arrive as plain text. Run a trial import on a copy first, either way.

Where Anytype shines

Worth knowing: No web app — desktop and mobile apps only. The object/relation model has a steeper learning curve than plain notes. Web capture, feeds and email-in aren’t part of the picture; it expects you to create, not collect.

Where SiYuan shines

Worth knowing: No collaboration and no first-party hosted sharing beyond exports and self-hosting. The interface is denser and less polished than Western commercial rivals, and documentation can be rough in translation. Capture from the web, email or feeds isn’t a focus.

Which should you choose?

Choose Anytype if:

Choose SiYuan if:

A third option: Dexi

SiYuan and Anytype both assume your knowledge starts as something you type into them — and both make you own the sync problem, whether that’s a $64 license and a bucket or a recovery phrase and a phone. If much of what you want to keep arrives from the web — articles, newsletters, RSS — Dexi starts there instead: everything you capture from your browser, inbox or phone becomes a searchable note next to the ones you write, linked by tags and [[wiki links]] into one graph, with semantic search across all of it and an MCP server so Claude can work with your notes directly. It’s web-based, so there’s nothing to sync or self-host — the trade being that your notes live on our servers, not your disk. Free for up to 1,000 notes, $5/month after that.

Frequently asked questions

Is Anytype open source?

Source-available, not open source in the OSI sense. All Anytype code is public on GitHub, and the any-sync protocol is open source and self-hostable, but the apps ship under the "Any Source Available License 1.0", which allows non-commercial use freely and restricts commercial use to networks authorized by the Any Association. SiYuan, by contrast, is AGPL-3.0 open source. Facts as of August 2026.

Is SiYuan free?

Yes — the full SiYuan app is free for personal and commercial use, with no note limits, stored locally. Money enters only for sync: a one-time PRO purchase ($64, list $96) unlocks encrypted sync and backup to your own S3 or WebDAV storage, and the official cloud is $148/year (list $296) for 8 GB with cloud asset hosting and a cloud inbox. Self-hosting the whole app in Docker is free. Prices as of August 2026.

Which is cheaper, SiYuan or Anytype?

For syncing a laptop and a phone: Anytype, which includes end-to-end-encrypted multi-device sync free with 100 MB of remote storage (Plus 1 GB $4/mo, Pro 10 GB $8/mo, Ultra 100 GB $16/mo billed yearly, or $5/$10/$20 monthly). SiYuan needs the $64 one-time PRO license plus your own S3/WebDAV storage, or its $148/year cloud. Over a few years both come out cheap; Anytype is cheaper by default, SiYuan cheaper if you never want a third party involved. As of August 2026.

Can Anytype import SiYuan notes?

Not directly — Anytype has no SiYuan importer. Export the SiYuan notebook to Markdown and import that folder into Anytype: files become objects, [[wikilinks]] become linked objects and #tags become tag relations, while SiYuan database views and block references flatten to text. The reverse (Anytype Markdown export → SiYuan Markdown import) works the same way, minus Anytype relations. Trial-import a copy first.

Which has better sync, SiYuan or Anytype?

Anytype for zero-effort sync: end-to-end encrypted, peer-to-peer, running by default on every device, free. SiYuan for sync on your own terms: encrypted sync to any S3 or WebDAV storage you control after a one-time $64 purchase, or the whole app self-hosted in Docker and used from a browser. Anytype can also be fully self-hosted (the any-sync network runs in Docker), but that is a project rather than a setting.

Collect, connect and search everything you read — free, no credit card required.

Try Dexi free

Related comparisons

More Anytype comparisons

More SiYuan comparisons

All comparisons →

Looking for Notion alternatives? Our guide, by use case →