Compare / Obsidian vs Logseq

Comparison

Obsidian vs Logseq

Obsidian is a free, local-first Markdown knowledge base with a plugin ecosystem thousands strong; Logseq is a free, open-source, local-first outliner with flashcards and a privacy-first ethos. Here’s how they compare on pricing, platforms, linking, search, capture and collaboration — and how to decide between them.

What is Obsidian?

Obsidian stores your notes as plain Markdown files in a folder on your own device — a “vault” you can read with any text editor, back up however you like, and keep forever. On top of those files it layers backlinks, a graph view, a Canvas whiteboard, and Bases (native database views over your notes, added in 2025). The app is completely free, including for commercial use since early 2025.

Its defining feature is the community: roughly two thousand plugins extend it with everything from spaced repetition to Kanban boards to AI integrations. Official add-ons are paid — Sync ($4/month, end-to-end encrypted) keeps vaults identical across devices, and Publish ($8/month) turns notes into a public site. There’s no web app; Obsidian runs as desktop and mobile apps against your local files.

What is Logseq?

Logseq is the open-source counterpart to Roam: an outliner built on bidirectional links and daily notes, but storing everything as local Markdown (or Org-mode) files on your device. It’s free, AGPL-licensed, and adds flashcards with spaced repetition, PDF annotation, queries, whiteboards and a plugin ecosystem. Sync is available end-to-end encrypted, or you can roll your own with Git or Syncthing.

The project is mid-transition: alongside the classic Markdown version, a rebuilt “DB version” backed by a local database entered public beta in July 2026, bringing real properties and Tana-style structured tags plus more reliable sync. That rewrite consumed several years of development attention, so the classic version evolved slowly — but the foundation of free, local, open-source outlining has kept a devoted community.

Obsidian vs Logseq at a glance

ObsidianLogseq
PriceApp free; Sync $4/mo; Publish $8/mo (annual billing)Free (open source); optional paid sync
Free planYes — the entire app, including commercial useYes — everything
PlatformsWindows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android — no web appWindows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android
Storage modelLocal-first — plain Markdown files on your deviceLocal-first — Markdown/Org files (DB version: local database)
Editing modelMarkdown documents with backlinks, Canvas and BasesOutliner — blocks, references, daily notes
Backlinks & wiki linksYes — [[wiki links]] with backlinks panelYes — bidirectional, block-level
Graph viewYes — 2D graph viewYes — graph view
SearchFull-text; semantic search via community pluginsFull-text and queries
Web captureOfficial web clipper extensionCommunity clippers; mobile quick capture
Email-in captureNoNo
RSS / feedsVia community pluginsNo
Team collaborationLimited — shared Sync vaults, no real-time co-editingNo
Publishing & sharingObsidian Publish ($8/mo) for public note sitesStatic-site export via community tools
AI assistant accessNo official AI; community plugins and MCP serversCommunity plugins and MCP servers
Offline accessYes — fully offlineYes — fully offline
Open sourceNo — proprietary app, open file formatYes — AGPL-3.0
End-to-end encryptionYes — Sync is end-to-end encryptedYes — Logseq Sync is end-to-end encrypted
Data exportFiles are already portable MarkdownMarkdown/Org files; OPML, JSON

Pricing and features as of mid-2026 — check each product’s site for current details.

Where Obsidian shines

Worth knowing: There’s no web app, and multi-device use effectively requires paid Sync or DIY setups. Collaboration is weak — shared vaults exist but there’s no real-time co-editing. Out of the box it’s fairly bare; the power comes from configuring plugins yourself, which is a hobby in its own right. Capturing web content, newsletters or feeds means assembling extensions and plugins rather than anything built in.

Where Logseq shines

Worth knowing: No real-time collaboration — it’s a single-player tool. The MD-to-DB transition splits the product; some features (like whiteboards) are temporarily missing from the DB beta. Polish and mobile experience trail the paid competition, and web capture relies on community tooling.

Which should you choose?

Choose Obsidian if:

Choose Logseq if:

A third option: Dexi

If what you actually want is one searchable place for notes, bookmarks, newsletters and RSS — with tags, @mentions and [[wiki links]] that organize themselves as you write, semantic search that finds ideas even when the words don’t match, and an MCP server so Claude and other AI assistants can work with your notes directly — take a look at Dexi. It’s free for up to 1,000 notes, with no app to install.

Frequently asked questions

What is the main difference between Obsidian and Logseq?

Obsidian is a free, local-first Markdown knowledge base with a plugin ecosystem thousands strong, while Logseq is a free, open-source, local-first outliner with flashcards and a privacy-first ethos. In practice, Obsidian is best for people who want complete ownership of their notes as local files and enjoy customizing their tools; Logseq is best for privacy-conscious outliner fans who want Roam’s ideas as free, open-source local files.

Which is cheaper, Obsidian or Logseq?

Obsidian: App free; Sync $4/mo; Publish $8/mo (annual billing) (free plan: yes — the entire app, including commercial use). Logseq: Free (open source); optional paid sync (free plan: yes — everything). Prices as of mid-2026 — check each product's site for current rates.

Is Obsidian or Logseq better for teams?

Obsidian — team collaboration: limited — shared sync vaults, no real-time co-editing. Logseq — team collaboration: no. If neither fits, Dexi's Team plan ($10/member/month) offers per-note sharing with team-wide search.

Can I switch between Obsidian and Logseq?

Both tools let you get your data out — Obsidian exports via files are already portable markdown, and Logseq via markdown/org files; opml, json. Markdown is the common ground for most migrations, though block references, properties and other tool-specific structure typically need manual cleanup after import.

Collect, connect and search everything you read — free, no credit card required.

Try Dexi free

Related comparisons